© Copyright 2010 • American Immigration Council • All Rights Reserved | Contact Us
On January 8, 2010, USCIS’s Associate Director Donald Neufeld issued a memo providing guidance, in the H-1B context, on determining employer-employee relationships. The memo adds requirements for H-1B petitions that are not covered by the H-1B regulations. Specifically, the memo precludes employers from placing H-1B workers at client worksites in many situations and bars many employer-owned businesses from filing an H-1B petition. This Litigation Issue Page highlights legal challenges to the memo and provides information about other advocacy efforts to change USCIS policy.
Litigation Updates [1] | Administrative Advocacy Updates [2] | Documents and Resources [3]
Broadgate et al. v. USCIS et al., No. 1:10cv00941 (D.C.D. filed June 8, 2010)
Three employers (software developers and IT services firms) and two not-for-profit trade associations are challenging the Neufeld memo in federal district court. The plaintiffs allege that USCIS issued the memo in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act’s notice and comment requirements; that USCIS failed to perform a Regulatory Flexibility Act analysis; that the memo is inconsistent with existing regulations addressing the employee-employer relationship and the term “contractor” and conflicts with the plain language of the INA; and that it is arbitrary and capricious. Plaintiffs ask the court to preliminarily and permanently enjoin USCIS from implementing the memo.
AILA Writes to USCIS Regarding Related Issues (January 26, 2010)
AILA sent a detailed letter [6] to USCIS Chief Council, Roxana Bacon, in which it expressed concern about the substance of the January 8, 2010 H-1B memo and noted that its issuance was in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act’s notice and comment requirements. The letter primarily focuses on recent USCIS decisions that unlawfully find that individuals with controlling or substantial interests in a petitioning U.S. company or its foreign parent company cannot -- in most cases -- be a beneficiary of a nonimmigrant or immigrant employment-based petition.
Links:
[1] http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/clearinghouse/litigation-issue-pages/h-1bneufeld-memo-employer-employee-relationship#LitUpdates
[2] http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/clearinghouse/litigation-issue-pages/h-1bneufeld-memo-employer-employee-relationship#admin-advo-updates
[3] http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/clearinghouse/litigation-issue-pages/h-1bneufeld-memo-employer-employee-relationship#DocsResources
[4] http://www.legalactioncenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/lac/BroadgateComplaint-6-8-10.pdf
[5] http://www.legalactioncenter.org/sites/default/files/docs/lac/BroadgateAppPreliminaryInjunction.pdf
[6] http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=31108
[7] http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=30950
[8] http://ailaleadershipblog.org/2010/02/01/why-is-h-1b-a-dirty-word/
[9] http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052748704402404574525772299940870-lMyQjAxMDA5MDAwMzEwNDMyWj.html